Rocky Hill coal mine case paves way for stronger legal protections for Aboriginal heritage

The following project came to our attention this week, and is being discussed widely here in Australia about the responsibility of Landscape Architects and landscape assessments in projects of this nature. Its seems that there are some who are of the opinion that the Landscape Architects failed to appropriately address cultural matters in their assessment, and others who believe that its is not the landscape assessments responsibility to do so.

It is all a very interesting read.

In short, a major coal mining project was rejected (very rare here!) on cultural and climate change grounds.

This article will give you a snapshot of what happened with regards to the Land and Environment Court's decision.

This link will take you to all of the docs (including the LVIA). Under the EIS drop down you will find Part 3 - visibility is the LVIA report.

Enjoy and food for thought

Landscape Foundation

Landscape affects every one of us, whether we were born here, are now living here, or whether we are travelling through New Zealand. Landscape affects our aspirations, the places we live in, who we are and what we identify with.

Previous
Previous

Call for design and landscape communities to support the protection of Ihumātao and the return of the land to mana whenua.

Next
Next

Historic Urban Public Parks: Are They Being Incrementally Spoiled?